PERFORMANCE COMMENTARY
Read in PDF Format
3rd QUARTER 2007
|
Average Annual Total Returns as of 9/30/2007*
|
|
|
Three
months*
|
1 Year
|
3 Year
|
5 Year
|
10 Year
|
Since Inception
6/3/1991
|
|
DSEFX
|
-1.91%
|
11.63%
|
9.59%
|
12.78%
|
5.28%
|
9.84%
|
|
S&P 500
|
2.03%
|
16.44%
|
13.13%
|
15.45%
|
6.57%
|
10.89%
|
|
Past performance is
no guarantee of future results. The Fund’s returns quoted above represent
past performance after all expenses. Investment return, principal value, and
yield will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be
worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower
or higher than the performance data quoted. For performance information
current to the most recent month-end, see below or call 1-800-498-1351.
For the period
reported in its current prospectus, during which net operating expenses were
capped by the Fund’s Manager, the Fund’s gross annual operating expenses totaled
1.24% of net assets. Until November 30, 2008, the Fund’s Manager has
contractually agreed to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses,
including management fees, so that expenses paid by the Fund will not exceed,
on a per annum basis, 1.15% of its average daily net assets representing
Investor shares. Each Domini Fund charges a 2.00% redemption fee on sales or
exchanges of shares made less than 30 days after the settlement of purchase
or acquisition through exchange, with certain exceptions. See the Fund’s
current prospectus
for further information.
Note:
On November 30, 2006, the Domini Social Equity Fund, formerly a passively
managed index fund, transitioned to an active management strategy. Past
performance before November 30, 2006, represents the former passive
investment strategy, and is not indicative of future results.
*Not Annualized
|
Economic and Market
Background
After dropping by about 9% from mid-July to mid-August, the S&P 500
Index recovered to finish the third quarter with a positive return of 2.03%.
The stock market’s recovery came only after the Federal Reserve cut its funds
rate by 0.5% in September — a bigger interest rate cut than the market had expected.
A primary factor in stock market volatility during the quarter concerned
the weakness of the housing market following its boom over the past few years.
Demand for houses has softened during 2007, and new housing starts, a significant
source of employment and economic activity, have fallen from almost 2.25
million units per month to only 1.3 million. This represents the largest
decline since the housing crash of the late 1980s.
Problems continued this quarter in the market for subprime mortgages: home
loans to borrowers who don’t qualify for standard mortgages. Though subprime
loans have made it possible for lower-income people to own homes, some lenders
have allegedly used pressure tactics, misleading information, and falsified documents
to make loans to people who had no realistic chance of repaying them. By the
end of the quarter, home foreclosures had doubled over the same period last
year. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) estimates that 1.5
million households will eventually be unable to meet their mortgage payments.
Because many subprime mortgages are “packaged” by Wall Street into
mortgage-backed bonds, these developments presented significant challenges for
the bond market, and triggered the stock market’s midsummer downturn when investors
learned that a number of hedge funds and financial firms had significant
subprime exposure. As several hedge funds and investment banks dealt with the
collapse of their subprime holdings, the broader market began to take a much
more cautious view of risk. Investors began moving away from riskier investments
(like small-cap stocks, which underperformed for the quarter) and banks began
tightening up on credit.
The Fed’s dramatic September interest rate cut succeeded in boosting the
spirits of the stock market, which responded with the S&P 500’s largest
single-day jump since early 2003. However, the interest rate cut also caused a
significant weakening of the dollar against foreign currencies, as foreign
investors saw a decrease in the interest yield from their U.S. dollar-based
holdings. It also caused a renewed fear of inflation. Data released in August,
however, showed that inflation for the previous year, as measured by the
personal-consumption expenditure index (PCE) excluding food and energy, rose
only 1.8%: within the 1% to 2% comfort zone of some Federal Reserve officials.
Inflation was at its lowest level since February 2004.
Oil prices increased from $73 to $82 per barrel during the quarter, due
in part to the weak dollar, since oil prices are denominated in U.S. dollars. In
the stock market, high oil prices helped the energy sector to lead the S&P
500 in performance, while information technology and industrials also performed
relatively well during the quarter. The most severe underperformance was in the
consumer discretionary sector, which dropped by over 6% on investor concern
that the fall in home values would lead to a decline in consumer spending. Hurt
by the turmoil in subprime mortgages, the financials sector also declined.
Portfolio Performance
For the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Fund declined by 1.91%, underperforming the S&P 500 Index by
3.94%.
As the stock market declined sharply from mid-July
through mid-August, many market observers noted that investment funds pursuing
quantitative stock selection strategies — like the approach taken by the Fund’s
subadvisor, Wellington Management Company — were underperforming the market. In
general, stocks whose valuation characteristics made them appear attractive to
quantitative stock selection models performed poorly. This was true for the
Fund, whose underperformance for the quarter occurred mainly during that one-month
period.
Looking at the Fund’s holdings, Fund
performance relative to the S&P 500 was hurt primarily by stock selection
in the energy, information technology, and consumer staples sectors. In
particular, the Fund’s position in Unit
Corp., a natural gas provider, hurt performance when shares declined after
the company reported a drop in earnings. The Fund was also hurt by its position
in the information technology company Electronic
Data Systems, whose shares declined after the company
missed Wall Street earnings expectations, and by the appliance manufacturer Whirlpool,
whose stock fell when the company missed sales expectations in its North
American operations. The Fund’s performance was also hurt by its position in
the finance company CIT Group, whose home lending portfolio was hurt by
difficulties in the subprime market.
The Fund’s relative performance was helped by
its position in Cummins, which benefited from strong foreign demand for
its low-emission diesel engines. Cummins says it is the largest foreign
investor in the diesel engine industry in China, and more than half of Cummins’
revenue comes from outside the U.S. The Fund also benefited by holding Western
Digital, which experienced strong demand from Europe for its hard-disk
drives.
Setting Standards
Two fundamental principles underlie our Global Investment Standards:
the promotion of a society that values human dignity and the enrichment of our
natural environment. We view these twin goals as crucial to a healthier,
wealthier, and more sustainable world.
By applying environmental and social standards to our
investments, we let corporations know that investors care about more than the
next quarter’s earnings. We care about how
they make their money. As a result, companies start paying attention to the
consequences of their actions, and changing the way they do business. No
company is perfect, but through the application of our standards we identify
companies that are making a difference, and encourage others to make notable
contributions to people and the planet.
One example is the
agricultural equipment company John Deere,
which was among the twenty companies that made the most positive contribution
to performance during the third quarter. Although John Deere manufactures heavy
equipment that runs on fossil fuels, it reports a number of notable
environmental initiatives.
In its most
recent Global Citizenship Report, John Deere describes an energy efficiency
program that began in 1972, and a worldwide greenhouse-gas inventory program initiated
in 2003. The company reported that from 1972 to 2006 it reduced total greenhouse
gas emissions per ton of production by 63%, and it described several recent
initiatives. During 2006 the company replaced an outdated building in the
Netherlands with a larger and more energy-efficient one, reportedly cutting
natural gas use by 25% and electricity consumption by 20%. In Germany, the
company installed a solar panel measuring 3,940 square feet at one of its
facilities, which can reportedly generate up to 45,000 kilowatt-hours of
electricity each year. In the U.S., John Deere has partnered with a developer
and Missouri’s Rural Electric Cooperatives to build the state’s first
utility-scale windpower project, which will produce enough power for 30,000
homes.
The company
also reports that its model 1490D Energy Wood Harvester contributes to the use
of alternative energy by compressing logging residue into fuel bundles that are
easy to transport and store, and that can be burned in power plants. Each of
these “slash logs” contains the energy equivalent of about half a barrel of
oil.
Shareholder Activism
On behalf of Fund
shareholders, Domini uses its voice as an owner — through direct dialogue,
shareholder resolutions, and proxy voting — to seek improvement in companies’
social and environmental behavior. We strive to move these companies toward better performance
on issues including labor conditions, global warming, product safety,
diversity, and poverty. We also speak out on public policy issues where we believe
we can bring a unique perspective as a socially responsible investment firm,
representing investors who care about human dignity and the future of the planet.
During the third quarter, we met with 16 companies in person
or by phone, including Hershey’s to discuss labor standards in the company’s supply chain, McDonald’s and Disney to continue
work on a multiyear project on factory working conditions, and Timberland to
discuss the company’s efforts to reduce its carbon footprint. We wrote to an
additional 212 companies, including 196 companies in North America, Europe, and
Asia that did not respond to the Carbon Disclosure Project, an annual survey of
greenhouse emissions data that is sent to the world’s largest companies on
behalf of institutional investors with $41 trillion under management.
We also continued
our efforts to protect the right to file shareholder resolutions, in response
to concepts raised in an official SEC release that could eliminate our ability
to file resolutions at certain companies. Our Action Alerts on the subject,
issued in July and September, generated more than 2,000 emails to the SEC. We
wrote to the SEC to address several specific concerns, and we drafted a comment
letter that was submitted on behalf of 47 institutional investors and service
providers from ten countries — all signatories of the Principles for
Responsible Investment — representing approximately $1.4 trillion under
management. The letter argued that shareholder resolutions “have served a
critical function by helping to convince U.S. companies to adopt more
responsible governance practices, to issue sustainability reports disclosing
indicators of social and environmental performance, and to take meaningful
steps to address those previously unrecognized risks.”
For more detail on Domini’s shareholder activism work,
please read the quarterly Social Impact Updates in the Shareholder Activism
section of our website
at www.domini.com.
Proxy
Voting
The voting rights that come with ownership of a
company’s stock can be an important tool for change. Domini is committed to
voting our shareholders’ proxies openly and responsibly to help influence a
wide range of corporate policies and governance issues.
According to a
new analysis by Jackie Cook of FundVotes.com, Domini continues to rank among
the most activist fund groups. For the year ended June 30, 2007, the 54 fund
groups examined supported about 90.7% of management proposals and 35.2% of
shareholder proposals. Domini supported 66% of management proposals and 63% of
shareholder proposals.
During the third quarter, the Fund voted on 63 proposals
at a total of 9 meetings. The Fund opposed management on 32% of the proposals
presented (20 out of 63). It did not vote on any shareholder proposals. The
Fund opposed the board of directors slate at Tidewater and Evergreen Solar
because they lacked gender or racial diversity.
Several years ago, in the wake of a range of
corporate scandals, the Domini Funds adopted a voting policy to strengthen the
independence and reliability of financial audits by opposing auditors that
charge more than 25% of their total fees to non-audit services. We are
concerned about potential conflicts of interest that arise when accounting
firms provide both audit and non-audit-related services to a company, and
derive significant fees for these non-audit services. During the quarter, the Fund opposed one proposal to approve
auditors because non-audit fees exceeded 25% of total fees.
For more information on Domini’s use of proxy voting,
please visit the Shareholder Activism section of our website at www.domini.com.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The Domini Social Equity Fund is not insured and is
subject to market risks. Investment return, principal value, and yield of an
investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be
more or less than their original cost. You may lose money.
The Advisor waived certain fees payable by the Fund
during the period and the Fund's average annual and quarterly total return
would have been lower had these not been waived. Total return figures are
historical and include changes in share price and reinvestment of dividends and
capital gains. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance
data quoted. For recent performance information current to the most recent
month-end, call 1-800-582-6757 or view the Performance page on our website, www.domini.com.
The composition of the Fund’s portfolio is subject
to change. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is an unmanaged index of common
stocks. You cannot invest directly in an index. Obtain a copy of the Fund’s
most recent Annual or Semi-Annual Report, containing a complete description of
the Fund’s portfolio, by calling 1-800-762-6814 or at www.domini.com.
This commentary should not be considered a
recommendation of the financial attractiveness as an investment of any of the
companies mentioned.
This
material must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus. Please read it
carefully before investing.
DSIL Investment Services LLC, Distributor. 10/07